MCR exhibited an ability to effectively and actively listen to and understand what our issues were and then apply their industry knowledge to solving our problems.
—Vice President of Transmission, JAA

Transmission Strategy

MCR does consulting work in various regional transmission organizations (“RTOs”), including MISO, SPP, PJM, CAISO and NYISO. Our clients—G&T cooperatives, municipals, joint action agencies, public power districts and independent transmission developers—have a goal of optimizing the value of their current and future investments in electric transmission. We help them realize the full revenue potential from their transmission assets.

Through our consulting assignments, we have created millions of dollars in value for our clients and broken new regulatory ground for our client base with landmark decisions in FERC rulings.

Key Staff

Ron Kennedy, Vice President

Ron Kennedy is a Vice President with MCR. He has 20 years of experience in consulting to the utility industry. His expertise includes transmission formula rates, Section 205 rate changes, transmission rate incentives, economic evaluation of RTO membership and financial evaluation of transmission projects. Ron is experienced in presenting to executive teams and Boards of Directors.


Client Stories

Developing a Strategic Business Plan for a Cooperative (Strategic Economic Analysis)

A Midwestern cooperative was faced with increased interconnection requests and wanted to ensure that its transmission OATT and rate formula was equitable and in line with general FERC and industry practices. Moreover, the client wanted to ensure that its transmission-related costs and appropriate return were recovered. Ensuring the cost recovery formula was consistent with industry practices was particularly important given the company was faced with multiple staff retirements, including accounting positions who would be responsible with updating the formula rate.

Developing a transmission formula rate and protocols for a transmission developer (Transmission Formula Rate Analysis)

A transmission developer participated in a public policy-based solicitation process and was awarded a segment of a very large transmission line project. The project represented the developer’s entrance into the RTO, which required a new formula rate and protocols. The transmission developer engaged MCR to develop and support the formula rate and protocols at FERC.

Conducting a review of a transmission formula rate (Transmission Formula Rate Analysis)

The general manager of a MISO transmission-owning municipal electric utility saw an MCR conference presentation and became interested in MCR’s Attachment O formula rate services. The general manager engaged MCR to make sure the utility was properly recording its costs and optimizing its transmission revenue in its existing transmission formula rate.

Conducting a transmission formula rate review and education of client staff for a joint action agency (Transmission Formula Rate Analysis)

A long time transmission owner in an RTO wanted to ensure that its transmission costs were properly recorded and documented and that its transmission revenue was being optimized when faced with changing RTO formula rate protocols.

Developing a transmission formula rate template for a joint action agency (Transmission Formula Rate Analysis)

MCR conducted a quantitative analysis before a joint action agency decided to invest in two major new transmission projects.

Conducting a review of the transmission formula rate of a nearby incumbent IOU (Transmission Formula Rate Analysis)

A municipal utility was faced with rapidly rising transmission rates from the neighboring incumbent IOU transmission owner. It had been many years since the municipal conducted an in-depth review of the IOU’s transmission costs. The municipal engaged MCR to review the IOU’s transmission formula rate template to ensure the costs were accurate.

Conducting a review of the transmission formula rate of neighboring IOU (Transmission Formula Rate Analysis)

A joint action agency was faced with an unusually large transmission true-up charge and was concerned the neighboring IOU made a significant analytical error.

Conducting a review of a transmission formula rate (Transmission Formula Rate Analysis)

A municipal electric utility, which is an existing transmission-owning utility in MISO, wanted to ensure that its transmission-related costs were being properly recorded in the MISO Attachment O cost template and that they were optimizing their annual transmission revenue requirement (“ATRR”), consistent with the tariff.

Developing transmission rate incentive filings at FERC for a joint action agency (FERC Filings)

A joint action agency decided to invest in a major new transmission project with other surrounding utilities. MCR assisted with filings to receive transmission rate incentives for the project.

Providing cost of capital expert testimony for a joint action agency (FERC Filings)

A joint action agency requested MCR to provide an analysis to determine a recommended ROE and support the recommended ROE with related expert testimony in anticipation of making a Section 205 rate filing at FERC.

Developing a Section 205 rate filing to change the formula rate template (FERC Filings)

A joint action agency was faced with an under recovery of its transmission-related costs because the standard transmission formula rate was not appropriate for its particular business situation. The joint action agency requested MCR’s assistance to help increase recovery of these costs.

Developing cost of capital expert testimony for joint action agency (FERC Filings)

A joint action agency formed a Transco in order to own transmission assets it had acquired from its members. As part of establishing the company, the Transco faced a number of contentious issues in its associated Section 205 FERC rate filing to establish its transmission formula rate. The Transco engaged MCR to provide expert testimony on one of the most critical issues in the filing: determining the appropriate level of cost of capital.

Conducting a valuation of transmission capacity rights (Strategic Economic Analysis)

A municipal utility was contemplating leaving its joint action agency and wanted to determine the value of its transmission capacity rights if it were to sell those rights to another member of the agency. After conferring with industry colleagues, city managers of the two municipals engaged MCR to conduct an independent valuation analysis of the transmission capacity rights to establish a fair sales price.

Quantifying economic benefits of joining an RTO as a transmission owner for a municipal utility (Strategic Economic Analysis)

A municipal utility client was contemplating membership as a transmission owner in a Regional Transmission Organization (RTO) and asked MCR to provide an independent cost-benefit analysis.

Providing economic analysis of a proposed new transmission investment for a G&T cooperative (Strategic Economic Analysis)

A generation and transmission (G&T) cooperative was investment in a highly visible regional transmission project that had complicated cost allocation methods. The client asked MCR to lead the client’s working team in conducting an analysis of the economics of the project and whether there was sufficient value for its members.

Developing a transmission business plan for a G&T Client (Strategic Economic Analysis)

A G&T asked MCR to lead an effort to develop a transmission business plan that articulated a clear vision and identified transmission investment opportunities that would enhance the reliability of cooperative members while also providing revenue that could partially hedge rising transmission rates.

Providing analysis and negotiation support for a municipal utility (Strategic Economic Analysis)

A municipal utility asked MCR to help determine whether it should be entitled to build a substation based on a desire to be neutrally invested within its pricing zone and to assist with negotiations with the incumbent utility.

Conducting an economic evaluation of an RTO membership (Strategic Economic Analysis)

A municipal utility recently expanded its transmission system and expected continued significant transmission investment for the next several years. The client was interested in whether it made economic sense to place its transmission assets and generation into MISO and take network integrated transmission service (“NITS”) as a MISO transmission owner (“TO”).

Conducting a review of the transmission formula rate and developing a transmission revenue forecast (Strategic Economic Analysis)

A transmission-owning municipal electric utility in MISO was significantly upgrading its existing transmission assets while moving from point-to-point service to network integrated transmission service (“NITS”). Because of this, the municipal wanted to ensure the upgraded assets obtained full revenue recovery in the MISO Attachment O formula rate to help offset their upcoming NITS costs.

Comparing transmission cost and rate competitiveness (Transmission Cost / Rate Competitiveness)

A cooperative’s transmission rates had been escalating at a higher pace than the average of other transmission owners in the RTO. A senior vice president of the cooperative engaged MCR to compare their transmission-related costs and resultant rate to those of a peer group of neighboring utilities to understand the current and projected rate gap and the drivers of the cost differences.

Analyzing the rate impact of joining an RTO (Transmission Cost/Rate Competitiveness)

A G&T was interested in exploring the possibility of joining a major RTO in its region. The G&T wanted to know which of its transmission-related costs would typically be included in the RTO transmission rate and how the RTO rate compared to the current transmission rate paid by their members.

Conducting a comparative capital investment analysis (Transmission Cost/Rate Competitiveness)

An independent transmission developer was filing comments at FERC to a Notice of Inquiry (“NOI”) to support transmission incentives. The independent transmission developer engaged MCR to support two specific return on equity (“ROE”) incentives: the continuance of an existing Transco ROE adder and the introduction of a new ROE adder to encourage joint investment with public power and cooperatives.

Insights

Key Staff

Ron Kennedy, Vice President

Ron Kennedy is a Vice President with MCR. He has 20 years of experience in consulting to the utility industry. His expertise includes transmission formula rates, Section 205 rate changes, transmission rate incentives, economic evaluation of RTO membership and financial evaluation of transmission projects. Ron is experienced in presenting to executive teams and Boards of Directors.